« 2007-05 | HomePage | 2007-07 »

06/28/2007

Potty mouth pundits

Counter Coulter,
>
I have a serious question. Does Ann Coulter have a mother or was she created in a lab? I suppose I could google her, or even worse, much worse, buy her book, but I'm not inclined to do either for the same reason that I won't make an effort to explore the chemical composition of dog shit, i.e., it certainly has a chemical composition, but in the end, it's still dog shit.
>
By the way, I sometimes start my blog on a blank AOL email. Why the *&^%$#@! does AOL feel the need to correct me when I use profanity? It gets red-lined just like a misspelled word! I'm paying them to censor me??????
>
That being said, and I already know the answer, how can it be that she gets face time on the tube? And why would Chris Mathews, aka, "tweety" by Crooks and Liars, pretend her opinions matter or that he's not complicit whenever little balls of shit roll out of her mouth on his show?
>
I'm being complicit too, I'm writing about both of them. FUCK ME!
>
Mohammad Ali once explained his big mouth strategy. He said he knew that people would watch him if he went against the typically expected subservient Negro behavior by being outrageous. I can't find the exact quotation, but he said, mimicking a typical, white, racsist boxing fan, "That *nigger got a big mouth, somebody better shut that *nigger up!"
>
Ann Coulter couldn't sew a patch on Mohammad Ali's jock strap. While she is simply detestable, Ali was gracious and kind, insulting but in a funny, clever way, his diatribes were laced with poetry and humor. In short, he wasn't a coward, he knew he'd have to face the man he was humiliating in the ring.
>
Ann Coulter, on the other hand, goes into a mania of neurotic ticks when confronted. Her eyes dart, her head spins, random thought explode through the hole in her head, she fidgets and feigns amusement while secretly seeking escape. 
>
* My use of nigger is not meant to be an insult to anyone, even white niggers. Gene
>
                           ---Lenny Bruce
>
"Now, why have I done this? Is this only for shock-value? Well, if all the niggers started calling each other 'nigger,' not only among themselves, which they do anyway, but among the ofays. If President Kennedy got on television and said: 'I'm considering appointing two or three of the top niggers in the country into my cabinet' - if it was nothing but nigger, nigger, nigger - in six months 'nigger' wouldn't mean any more than 'goodnight,' 'God bless you,' or "I promise to tell the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth so help me God - when that beautiful day comes, you'll never see another nigger kid come home from school crying because some ofay motherfucker called him a nigger."
>
From True magazine:

[Dick] Gregory turned to me: “This man [Lenny Bruce] is the eighth wonder of the world. You have to go back to Mark Twain to find anything remotely like him. And if they don’t kill him, or throw him in jail, he’s liable to shake up this whole fuckin’ country.”

A year later, Gregory published his book Nigger dedicated to “Dear Momma - Wherever you are, if you ever hear the word ‘nigger’ again, remember they are advertising my book.”
[source]

06/27/2007

The Populist Party responds

With friends like these ... 
>
The Populist Party People have responded to my inquiry about their stand on Social Security reform. In
Shades of Thomas Paine : PittsburghThoughts I wrote about my new found affection for the Populist Party based on the writings of Michael Boldin, available at the above link.
>
He's a straight talking, sensible fellow as demonstrated by making this, somehow obvious, yet rapidly becoming obscurere point in Top-Ten Reasons to Get Out of Iraq. Now!  
The U.S. military has absolutely no right, whether legal or moral, to be killing people who live in Iraq.  It has no right to even be in Iraq.  Why is this? Because neither the Iraqi government nor the Iraqi people ever attacked the United States.  This fact makes the war in Iraq an optional one, not a necessary one. 
Plain talk and common sense all in one paragraph? I can't say I'm not wielding a HUGE saltshaker to provide my daily dose of skepticism, but, if a growing Populist movement helps combat the spiral by which our democracy in being drawn into the black hole of corporate rule, I support it.
>
But they wrote back:
Thanks for your email - some very important issues.
>
It is our position that the system has not provided the benefits that were promised when it was created.  Costs have also soared far more than the 2% of our income that it was supposed to cost.
>
Thus, we strongly support rexamining these failures and coming up with potentially new solutions to retirement.  Privatization, as the current politicians talk about, is nothing more than corporatism - forcing you, through taxation, to give your retirement funds to a financial corporation of the politicians' choosing.
>
We believe that social security, a program that is not authorized by the constitution, needs to be kept up for those that have been told to rely on it.  But, we also support a transistion - one that would allow you to choose whether you'd like to continue in the system, or make your own retirement decisions.
>
What are your thoughts?  We welcome your input, pro or con.
>
In liberty,
>
Populist Party of America
I'm confused. Are they miffed because Social Security hasn't provided the benefits promised while abhorring the costs because they think we are entitled to them but are getting a raw deal? It doesn't seem likely. They cite Social Security's lack of constitutionality as if not being mentioned in the constitution is all that's required to disavow it. Using that logic we can also disavow:
  • Marriage
  • Traveling
  • Voting
  • Procreation
and a host of other assumed rights that we take for granted on a daily basis. Other rights not specifically mentioned in the constitution are tangentially mentioned, and the point that we have them is specific. The Ninth Amendment says:
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
Once again, straight talking and sensible. But, since the argument can be made that other rights retained by the people couldn't have possibly included Social Security, not in 1789, when the Constitution went into effect, it's still a tenuous argument.
>
Yanking the security net out from under millions of Americans is not only unethical but immoral, and the truth is, people trust private enterprise even less than the government.
>
It sounds to me ... that the populists want exactly what the conservatives want with regards to Social Security reform. It's particularly obvious in their pandering declaration that: [Social Security] needs to be kept up for those that have been told to rely on it. That phrase, that gesture of humanity, always makes its way into every plan to gut the most successful, social compact between government and its people since the Constution, while sounding somehow "nice."
>
It's not the people that rely on it that are driving the system to insolvency. Reagan and Allen Greenspan conspired to plunder Social Security in the early 80's Greenspan's Fraud -- Thom Hartmann's "Independent Thinker" Book of the Month by:
... recommend[ing] a near-doubling of the Social Security tax on the then-working Boomers. That tax created - for the first time in history - a giant savings account that Social Security could use to pay for the Boomers' retirement.
Their plans was only to superficially address the coming mass baby boomer retirement, in reality:
... within the period of a few short years, Reagan dramatically dropped the income tax on America's most wealthy by more than half, and roughly doubled the Social Security tax on people earning $30,000 or less. It was, simultaneously, the largest income tax cut in America's history (almost entirely for the very wealthy), and the most massive tax increase in the history of the nation (which entirely hit working-class people).

But Reagan still had a problem. His tax cuts for the wealthy - even when moderated by subsequent tax increases - weren't generating enough money to invest properly in America's infrastructure, schools, police and fire departments, and military. The country was facing bankruptcy.

No problem, suggested Greenspan. Just borrow the Boomer's savings account - the money in the Social Security Trust Fund - and, because you're borrowing "government money" to fund "government expenditures," you don't have to list it as part of the deficit. Much of the deficit will magically seem to disappear, and nobody will know what you did for another 50 years when the Boomers begin to retire 2015.

The Populists, like the conservatives do not want to be their brothers keeper by funding a minimal retirement, or providing for the fatherless, motherless or the disabled. Why? It would cost them money. In my mind, this in itself, disqualifies Populism from any further serious consideration.
>
Let the ones that broke the system fix it, and not with pie in the sky private accounts but by taking the money from those that can afford it best and removing the ceiling on how Social Security taxes wages. Payroll tax is now collected on only the first $90,000 of a worker's annual income no matter how much a person earns.
>
We are creating more and more million and billionaires and, even though the average person can just barely make enough to pay his and her bills, eat and keep a roof over their heads, we are expected, through extreme, supreme frugality, to put away for our, "Golden Years."
>
Millionaires and billionaires make it here, we buy their goods and services, we help provide the roads, the courts, the infrastructure that allows them to rise to the top, let them pay back to mankind for once and not only through their guilt inspired, self serving charitable gestures. Either give me huge tax breaks so I can save, or take theirs away.
>
Now, that's a position I'll support.   Gene 

06/26/2007

Caucasian Wingnuts

I wanted to post this picture right after we returned from visiting our daughter in New Jersey, but, I forgot. (Hey, if Alberto can't remember shit, why should I?)

We spent a lovely day at the Brooklyn Botanical Gardens and I snapped this photo of the tree's nameplate.

15c9636de15785fd1d438b3233edc3e5.jpg

Or, could it be the family tree?

553345c59e34481893befd0ccc6dd70e.jpg

                           

 

 

 

 

 

 

06/25/2007

Today's stories

News you won't see anywhere else,
>
Dick Cheney seceded from the union today. He filed official papers with the little known Department of Secession and was granted the status of a " Protected Territory."
>
President George W. Bush has put an end to the speculation over what he'll do after his presidency expires. "Laura and I are preparing ourselves for retirement in *Albania," he said at yesterday's news conference, adding, "why limit yourself to one country? Besides the U.S. ain't what it use to be, heh heh."
>
Parenthetically, Condi Rice plans on becoming the first black, female, ice skating pianist after her term expires. "The piano will be fitted with skates and will track her movements on the ice," a spokesman for the Disney Corporations said, adding, "she is simply stunning in sequins."
>
A secret email was intercepted from Grover Norquist to the White House yesterday after it was accidentally sent to Greg Palasts's bogus website  GeorgeWBush.ORG instead of GeorgeWBush.COM saying:
"Hear, Hear George! You've virtually destroyed the federal government. I salute you!"
Meanwhile, at the White House parody site, WWW.WHITEHOUSE.ORG we find this positive, abstinence only message at, Sex is for FAGS! - Abstinence-Only Program for Boys containing these Christian value affirming testimonials:


Cool Program Testimonials
Bert F.: "My body is a sacred place, for holy stuff like Capri Sun juices, Lunchable Chicken Dunks, and Slim Jims (I like to snap into them!). The one thing that won't EVER go into my body? Girl slime!"
Greg B.: "I joined Sex is for Fags after watching girls who put out turn my big brother into a major wuss. By learning to repress my urges, now I can to grow up and be what I always wanted: a prison guard or a priest."
Zach P.: "Premarital sex isn't worth it! You can catch AIDS, or cancer, or testicle weevils, or a bad body image or rickets. You know what IS worth it? Making love to Jesus. Because you can't knock Him up and He'll never ask what you're thinking – cuz He already knows!"
Tim R.: "I hate fags. Dude, I mean, dudes who can't stop touching their wangs? DUDE. So, like, I joined Sex Is For Fags because it IS. You won't catch me doing that – with dudes OR chicks. Well, at least not until I get my trust fund and start needing some serious tax deductions."
>
White House Spokesman Tony Snow acknowledged for the first time yesterday that, "By all accounts Iraq has gone to hell in a hand basket," adding, "this does not necessarily mean a change in policy." After being roundly booed, he shouted, "HEY, I'VE GOT CANCER YOU FUCKIN ASSHOLES!"
>
Donanld Rumsfeld has signed a 3 year contract with The Simpsons, he'll be doing the voice of their new character, official Pentagon Spokesmans, Lieutenant General Geoffrey H. Cheespack. Rumsfeld is delighted with his new job saying, "He's a zany, cantankerous old coot impervious to reality, ha ha ha ha ha, where would they get an idea like that?" 
>
Legislation was introduced today by key Bush supporters to outlaw the children's nursery rhyme, Humpty Dumpty. An unnamed key Bush supporter said, "At times like these we don't need to indoctrinate our children with anti-Bush rhetoric."
>
It's old news that Joe Lieberman wants to nuke Iran but today he's heated up the debate saying he wants to "Wipe Iraq off the map." When reminded that's exactly what Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said about Israel, Liberman paused and said. "SEE!"
>
And that's all the news behind the news, behind the news.   Your lonely sentinel,  Gene
>
*For some reason Albanians love this motherfucker.

06/24/2007

All apologies

Hear ye, hear ye, 

In a previous blog, through a misunderstanding or perhaps a poorly worded sentence, I dissed Whatever It Is, I'm Against It. The author was man or woman enough to explain what he meant and agreed with me that it could have been worded better.

Therefore, I am once again recommending Whatever It Is, I’m Against It to my readers in the hope that you'll visit. He (or she) has some great entries and you would be as remiss to not drop in from time to time as I have been.   Gene

War, civil war and more war

 Today's treatise,

Here, on the left, we're waging war on what we see as the perversion of our government's responsibility to its people. But, it was a Republican President, Abraham Lincoln, who said at Gettysburg,

We here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain—that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom—and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.  Abraham Lincoln, "Address Delivered At The Dedication Of The Cemetery At Gettysburg," November 19, 1863.

David Wills, a prominent citizen of Gettysburg charged with cleaning up after the grisly battle of July 1-3, urged the president to attend the ceremony. Lincoln's presence, Wills stated in a letter of invitation, would,

"... kindle anew in the breasts of the Comrades of those brave dead, who are now in the tented field or nobly meeting the foe in the field, a confidence that they who sleep in death on the Battle Field are not forgotten by those highest in Authority; and they will feel that, should their fate be the same, their remains will not be uncared for."

We were a nation torn asunder by a civil war that had been brewing for years, the last straw came when Lincoln was elected on the anti-slavery platform, The wealthy English planters that had settled in the Province of South Carolina would not yield their English birthright; slave labor.

Oddly, slave ownership in the south (in the North slavery was largely outlawed before the civil war but it had been just as brutal and heartless as in the South) was considered to be an anti-capitalism enterprise by George Fitzhugh, in his book, Sociology for the South, or, the Failure of Free Society (1854). From George Fitzhugh - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia:

Sociology for the South, or, the Failure of Free Society ...took on not only Adam Smith, the foundational thinker of capitalism, but also John Locke, Thomas Jefferson, and the entire liberal tradition. He argued that free labor and free markets enriched the strong while crushing the weak. What society needed, he wrote, was slavery, not just for blacks, but for whites as well. "Slavery," he wrote, "is a form, and the very best form, of socialism." Fitzhugh believed that slavery reduced the pressure on the poor and lower class, in other words, advocating slavery for poor whites as well as blacks.

In his mind, capitalism in the form envisioned by Adam Smith was the enemy and it was slavery that served the common good. His sentiments resonant with the whack jobs of today, only today, since slavery in this country has become, superficially, taboo, it has been replaced by cheap labor and capitalism has achieved the revered status as the savior to the world. The times have changed, the names and faces have changed but somehow a justification for a wealthy elite never wavers.

It would be nice to think that, then, unlike now, people knew where the stood and why, that you either believed you were entitled to exploit other people through fear of death, or, you believed slavery was morally reprehensible. In reality things were probably like they are today, only then most people were illiterate, and now, most people may as well be.

One thing that never changes, there will always be enough rich and powerful people to propagandize and intimidate the rest in order to protect their own interests. From Propaganda In The Civil War:

In their efforts to win popular sympathy and combat Northern propaganda, the Confederates bad established such agencies of publicity as their resources would permit. English writers were employed in the newspaper and magazine field; spokesmen in Parliament were sought; pamphlets and books were published and freely distributed; news agencies were presented with prepared material; and a special newspaper, the Index, was set up by the chief Confederate propaganda agent, Henry Hotze...

Slavery was good until it wasn't, war is useful until it isn't. The southern aristocrats lost their war but had still managed to convince enough of the poor and brave to wage it. This conflict of ideology, even with its biblical justifications, was put to rest and the 13th, 14th, and 14th amendments were given birth. While today we still struggle with our brutal past, our hangings, floggings, hate prejudice and fear, equal rights are only given begrudgingly or through court action and public outcry.

This brings us back to the greatness of Lincoln, willing to wage war, not for plunder or spoils, not for empire and not for oil, but so that a unified country that adhered to the principles set forth in the constitution would prevail and a "government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth." 

Today, the federal government is too powerful for states to consider seceding and the motivation to keep the country unified, if they did, would not be as noble as in Lincoln's time. Today, the rich are extravagantly richer and the internal workings of the government have been adjusted to accommodate them.

Rather than amputate that gangrenous leg, it has festered and infected our thinking to the point that now we have come to export our wars and while never having completely eliminated our rich, white, birth-right, mentality we pursue its goals  elsewhere around the world. We are the fading world economy. Somehow democracy and capitalism became synonymous in our sucker's paradise of consumerism. Could our abandoned beliefs of freedom and brotherhood be the root cause?

 A country born and bred of war may, very well likely, perish in one too.    Gene

06/23/2007

Hey, here's another movie you can take your favorite neocon to see!

No End In Sight | Charles Ferguson | Representational Pictures

06/21/2007

What would Aesop say?



Some bunnies should not be fucked with- Aesop

He did it again ...

Remarks by President Bush on Stem Cell Veto and Executive Order - Christian Newswire:

"Destroying human life in the hopes of saving human life is not ethical -- "  George W. Bush June 20, 2007

Don't you wish that Bush was as concerned about the destruction of emails as he is about the destruction of "embryos?" His panties are in a twist over a collection of cells a few days old, that AREN'T embryos. They ARE 16 cell *zygotes.

How quaint, how republican, how Christian Conservative to worry about nonsense while blithely destroying millions of real lives for nothing, nada, zip.

From STAGES OF DEVELOPMENT from ovum/sperm to newborn baby:

*About 3 days after conception: The zygote now consists of 16 cells and is called a 16 cell morula (a.k.a. pre-embryo). It has normally reached the junction of the fallopian tube and the uterus.
>
5 days or so after conception: A cavity appears in the center of the morula. The grouping of cells are now called a blastocyst. It has an inner group of cells which will become the fetus and later the newborn; it has an outer shell of cells which will "become the membranes that nourish and protect the inner group of cells." 3 It has traveled down the fallopian tubes and has started to attach itself to the endometrium, the inside wall of the uterus (a.k.a. womb). The cells in the inside of the blastocyst, called the embryoblast, start forming the embryo. The outer cells, called the trophoblast, start to form the placenta. It continues to be referred to as a pre-embryo.
>
9 or 10 days after conception: The blastocyst has fully attached itself to endometrium. Primitive placental blood circulation has begun. This blastocyst has become one of the lucky ones. Most never make it this far in the process.
>
12 days or so after conception: The blastocyst has started to produce hormones which can be detected in the woman's urine. This is the event that all (or almost) all pro-choice groups and almost all physicians (who are not conservative Christians) define to be the start of pregnancy.
*************************************
Those Darling zygotes
                                                                  
medium_embryo.jpg
P.S. For clarity's sake, depending on the source used, the terms: zygote, blastocyst and embryo are all used to describe the development of the fertilized egg. From MedlinePlus Medical Encyclopedia: Fetal development:

When sperm is deposited in the vagina, it travels through the cervix and into the Fallopian tubes. Conception usually takes place in the Fallopian tube. A single sperm penetrates the mother's egg cell, and the resulting cell is called a zygote.

The zygote contains all of the genetic information (DNA) necessary to become a child. Half of the genetic information comes from the mother’s egg, and half from the father’s sperm.

The zygote spends the next few days traveling down the Fallopian tube and divides to form a ball of cells. Further cell division creates an inner group of cells with an outer shell. This stage is called a "blastocyst". The inner group of cells will become the embryo, while the outer group of cells will become the membranes that nourish and protect it.

The blastocyst reaches the uterus at roughly the fifth day, and implants into the uterine wall on about day six. At this point in the mother's menstrual cycle, the endometrium (lining of the uterus) has grown and is ready to support a fetus. The blastocyst adheres tightly to the endometrium, where it receives nourishment via the mother's bloodstream.

The cells of the embryo now multiply and begin to take on specific functions. This process is called differentiation, which produces the varied cell types that make up a human being (such as blood cells, kidney cells, and nerve cells).

However, it is a scientific fact that stem cells only occur, and can be harvested, before differentiation takes place, whether it's at 3 days, 5 days or whether you call it a zygote or a blastocyst.

06/20/2007

And now for something completely different

If you've stayed with me after that rather bizarre blog of two days ago, thanks. Now it's time for something really BITCHING!

No, I'm not using "bitching" in the 1980's, adjective sense, such as, "That's a bitching stereo system," I'm going to bitch, (again.)

Yesterday, my wife and I sat in a University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, (UPMC) facility waiting room for 3 hours in order to be told we might have to wait. If you're familiar at all with Pittsburgh, you know that UPMC is the mega-medical monster that has gobbled up (by my count) all but two of Pittsburgh's hospitals and Pittsburgh is, or was, a city of hospitals.

Pittsburgh is part of Allegheny county and Allegheny county has the 2nd largest elderly population in the country, so we need lots and lots of medical care but what we get is a gigantic, supposedly non-profit (meaning: they pay no city tax) monopoly that made 1/2 billion last year, after expenses.

Medical care? Well, they did transplant my liver and I am still alive, so I did receive it. But, here's my problem; the waiting room was full, stuffed with sick and some not-so-sick people, but, if you're in that particular waiting room, the odds are you have something serious and you're scared even if symptom one hasn't appeared yet. You're scared and you're from out of town. You're scared, you're from out of town and you've been told, "Pittsburgh is the place for you," because Pittsburgh has it all." Thomas Starzl, research, world class, you name it, we got it.

It's not unusual to talk to people that have come from out of state and from out of the country. This is their, last, best hope to be healed. The people sitting next to me only traveled 100 miles from Erie, Pa., a wife, grand daughter and an older looking gentleman that had a liver transplant only two days previously. They had been sitting well mannered and patiently for several hours. They were one family out of a family of families, sitting, waiting, scared, and confused in this sprawling, seemingly endless new world of medical mystery.

The big black woman at the desk seemed to be an exception to the standard, bureaucratic, medical functionary rule. I sensed that she was disgusted with the way things were going too. She looked at me and ask, "Have you had your blood work yet?" "No," I said. "Go see Zack," she said.  I walked the 100 yards to the blood lab and took a seat, Zack must be their premiere Phlebotomist. He was busy trying to stick a pretty young girl whose arms were a series of bruises from repeated needle pokes. She was use to it, she seemed calm and composed, she said that the record was 9 attempts to unearth a buried vein. 

Her mom came in to check on her. The woman that was preparing to draw my blood talked to her and did her best to empathize with her, except, she ended up sounding hollow and cruel. She didn't know what to say and made an inappropriate joke. The mother didn't react. Being impervious to stupidity and incompetence is a prerequisite for victims of disease and to the systems that combat disease.

UPMC advertises a lot. They seem to want to counter or preempt any negative word of mouth publicity that may circulate. They say lofty things about their care, they are saints in their own minds. They talk about, "making every effort, putting themselves in your shoes, accuracy, emotional support, treating the 'Whole person' accessibility."

Because of a mix-up they said they wouldn't be able to see me, unless I was willing to wait 2 more hours, even though, I had scheduled my clinic visit 2 months prior. I rescheduled, filled out the survey / complaint card and we left.  Gene

All the posts