« 2008-01 | HomePage | 2008-03 »

02/29/2008

On being a good union man instead of a rammy-headed bastard

Mass transit hysteria,
>
I usually don't do local issues. I find them infuriating, hard to grasp, contemptible and inaccessible. But, like anyone in this town who's ever carelessly tossed their garbage out of a car window, I have an opinion on Pittsburgh's vagina envy.
>  
I'm talking about the "Small Dig," you dig? The "Big Dig" that swallowed Boston is now infamous in it's cost overruns, crap design and its shoddy shittiness. So what does Pittsburgh do? It emulates Boston but on a much smaller scale in terms of necessity and about the same scale in cluelessness.
>
I'm a union guy, and the union guy way is to welcome work regardless of the consequences, so if city council wants to built an anti-gravity mass transportation system, which some members actually did want to build, or gambling casinos, which it is doing despite very active underworld involvement, I'm supposed to jump up and down and shout whippee.
>
I remember a nuclear issue in my early years as an union electrician apprentice. Next door to our very classy union meeting room, at the time being held in a rather large ballroom of the Pittsburgh Hilton, there was a conference discussing atomic power, pros and cons.
>
 It was possibly one of those public meetings that the powers that be hold in order to accuse the opposition of not attending when the shit hits the fan, or in this case when the radioactive particle hits the blood cell.
Anyway, our beady eyed, ruddy complected, alcohol breathed Business Agent was in high dudgeon over this adjacent meeting. I suppose he though that they were  going to put the brakes on the entire nuclear industry then and there and he was driving the car. Or, the IBEW was driving the car, or labor was about to hit a stop sign and because he never stopped at a stop sign in his whole friggin life he resented it or maybe he was just drunk.
>
He adjourned the meeting, to be resumed next door where we would actively assert our right to be disruptive and abusive union goons. I went home instead.
>
I had become friendly with one of the International's (IBEW's) big shot's sons. We were on jobs together several times over the years and he was later to become my apprentice and confided to me that; the International had dispatched speakers to that next door meeting to speak on behalf of the nuclear industry and because WE disrupted it, they never got a chance to speak. Ha, Ha on that rammy headed bastard, the International was pissed.
>
While, I too, welcome work in our depressed, ex-prosperous, ex-forge of the universe town, my son is a budding product of union nepotism, I would rather spend those billions on something that we need, not something that Steeler Chairman, Dan Rooney and his army of rammy headed, drunken fans think is a cool idea. You see, the tunnel runs from downtown, under the river, to the Steeler's front gate.
>
In one hundred years, or so, when they finally, if ever, extend that tunnel and the miniature railroad that it's to house, to the North Hills of Pittsburgh and rather that take their George Jetson flying cars to work, the good people of the North Hills opt for mass transit, I may regret I wrote this but I doubt it.   Gene 

02/24/2008

Things to watch, read and ponder

Of note,
>
I love when the "free Market" comes around and bites the ___________ (insert your own term) on the ass.
>
It's rewarding on so many levels. At the gut level it's brimming with schadenfreude, I revel in anything that exposes the___________(insert your term) and their specialized sense of economics.
>
In this situation it's the combination of parallel ideologies and the consequences thereof that uproot their entire diseased crop of military lies and atrocities.  
>
I'm talking about the fear that's instilled in the media to report on events. I'm talking about the self censorship designed to not offend the delicate balance that keeps us blithely in concurrence with, as Bob Dylan called them, the Masters of War. 
 d3c748d731291ddaca5b4642cfc15f75.jpg
 Taxi to the Dark Side, a documentary about an innocent Afghan taxi driver tortured to death by U.S. officials at Bagram Air Base, has received wide critical acclaim since its debut in April at the Tribeca Film Festival. The New York Times’s A.O. Scott said, “If recent American history is ever going to be discussed with the necessary clarity and ethical rigor, this film will be essential.”

Earlier this month, ThinkProgress reported that the Discovery Channel broke its contract to broadcast Taxi prior to the 2008 elections. With plans to take the company public, executives were afraid the “film’s controversial content might damage Discovery’s public offering.”

In response to the Discovery Channel's cowardly business decision:  

In a press release on Thursday, HBO announced that it has bought the rights to Taxi and will show the film in September 2008.

Giving the Discovery Channel the cover it needs for a thin, face saving maneuver and announce that they: 

 ...may also show the film on cable in 2009. [After President Bush is out of office.]

 ************************************

Somewhere along the line I wrote:

According to Carl Berstein, in his 628-page book on Hillary, A Woman in Charge: The Life of Hillary Rodham Clinton:

"She argued with Bill Clinton when she was First Lady, her husband,(sic) she said ‘Bill, you are doing Republican economics when you are doing NAFTA.’ She was against NAFTA. And if she would somehow come out and tell the real story of what she fought for in the White House and failed in a big argument with her husband she would end up moving much closer to those Edwards followers."

I commented, if true, it was reassuring. It may be true, however, her voting record on the subject isn't. According to Hillary Clinton on the Issues she:

  • Voted against CAFTA despite Bill Clinton's pushing NAFTA. (Oct 2005)
  • Voted YES on free trade agreement with Oman. (Jun 2006)
  • Voted NO on implementing CAFTA for Central America free-trade. (Jul 2005)
  • Voted YES on establishing free trade between US & Singapore. (Jul 2003)
  • Voted YES on establishing free trade between the US and Chile. (Jul 2003)
  • Voted NO on extending free trade to Andean nations. (May 2002)
  • Voted YES on granting normal trade relations status to Vietnam. (Oct 2001)
  • Voted YES on removing common goods from national security export rules. (Sep 2001)

Giving her a mixed record on free trade.

Disclaimer: the nuances and justifications for her votes are beyond my scope and I'm taking a purely protectionist stance.

*****************************************

Tonight, 60 Minutes will finally air an expose' on Don Seigleman's plight. On the surface it appears to have vast implications for the Bush Presidency, the Attorney General appointment fiasco and it exposes the sheer disregard that a select group of conspiring Republicans, including Karl Rove, have for a man, his career and his family.

Here's a short synopsis, I'm not sure when this was aired:

P.S. In the Alabama 2002 general election, machines made by Election Systems and Software (ES&S) flipped the governor's race. Some 6,300 Baldwin County electronic votes mysteriously disappeared after polls had closed and everyone had gone home. Democrat Don Siegelman's victory was handed to Republican Bob Riley, and the recount Siegelman requested, was denied.

02/22/2008

Another socialist rant

The defenders of all things Bush, will they ever give me peace?

They're rallying around McCain, not that they love him, they hate the New York Times. And, oddly enough, the New York Times has endorsed his candidacy. That's just one of many contradictions that exist in the skewered world of politics were partisans of all stripes are willing to overlook what they don't want to see.

But, McCain aside, Bush and his disastrous presidency has been given, ad nauseam, the green light to eviscerate every form of control that we believed, in our naivete, to be immutable.

The Wall Street Journal's editorial board is one of the most egregious and that isn't only since taken over by Rupert Murdock and his shameless propagandists. Today, GABRIEL SCHOENFELD opines in The Bush Secrecy Myth - WSJ.com that the Bush administration hasn't really been secretive in its dealings with the American people and if it has been, is that so bad? His concluding paragraph is brilliant in its twisted logic:

The Bush administration has been lambasted for excessive secrecy. But its persistently passive attitude toward the torrent of leaks that have sprung from its intelligence and national-security apparatus make it one of the country's least-secretive administrations. It would be much better for the country if the administration took seriously the dangers of transparency in an age when the revelation of secrets can get us killed by the thousands. This would involve not only the vigorous enforcement of existing laws, but exercising leadership to change a culture in which leakers are hailed by the press as "whistle blowers," even as they flout their oaths of office and violate the law.

See, Bush hasn't been secretive after all, that is, if it weren't for those damn whistle blowers getting us killed by the thousands.

********************************************

A second example, also from today's WSJ, schools us on why it's just too damn hard to have a treaty banning space weapons. Don't Panic About Space Weapons - WSJ.com:

The Bush administration is right to reject this treaty [Russia's Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and China's U.N. representative in Geneva, Li Baodong, introduced a joint draft treaty aimed at banning weapons in space ...] and any successor administration should do so as well. The hard, if unpalatable, truth is that a peaceful space regime cannot be achieved by any feasible arms-control arrangement. The long track record of diplomatic failures, going back to the 1978-79 U.S.-Soviet ASAT negotiations, amply corroborates this judgment.

God forbid peace should break out.

********************************************

With everyone from John Stewart to Media Matters daily ripping their arguments to shreds, how do they manage to continue hopping along the bunny trail like they do? They are united by the purest of principles: might makes right, and money makes might.

They stand noble in their call to arms, the invaders are at the gates. We will take them, shake them and break them. We hate them and their children!

Or so, they'd like to believe. Think; Scrooge McDuck and his swimming pools of cash, happily diving in and taking a dip, only today he wears bullet belts across his chest and brandishes an M-16 as we dare to ask, "May I have some more sir...please?"   Gene

9aecaebca709c3eb847255154a1645b1.jpg

Breaking News

McCain Screams at AP reporter, "Gimme a break! I had to jerk-off in that Hanoi shit hole for 5 years! I deserve some side action!

This evening an obvioulsy upset and antagonized John McCain let it rip....blah, blah, blah, bleepity, bleep, bleep, etc, etc...

02/21/2008

A PittsburghThoughts exclusive

PittsburghThoughts exclusive: Vicki Iseman, "Yeah, I bonked the old fuck!"
f71ecf7d05a12d9e02295d83b29fe9b9.jpg
Me:
Vicki, did you have sexual relations with that man?
Vicki:
Yeah, I bonked the old fuck.
Me:
Vicki, did you consider the consequences?
Vicki:
Yeah, I bonked the old fuck.
Me:
Vicki, do you feel bad about the possible derailment of McCain's presidential run?
Vicki:
Yeah, I bonked the old fuck.
Me:
Vicki, you don't really have much to say beside, "I bonked the old fuck," do you?
Vicki:
Yeah, I bonked the old fuck.
Me:
Define "Bonked."
Vicki:
BONK YOU!
Me:
There you have it, a PIttsburghThoughts exclusive! She bonked the old fuck!

Nelson Mandela credited WHO?

RE: Yesterday's post,

I found the Saul Landau interview that I wanted for yesterday's post, split it into two parts due to size limitations and edited the post to include it.

One part that stands out: Nelson Mandela, on being released from prison, bushed away Castro's hand, refusing his hand shake and embraced him saying, "You made this possible."   Gene

From Isaac Saney - The Story of How Cuba Helped to Free Africa:

Cuba's direct, critical and extensive role in the struggle against the apartheid regime in South Africa is little known in the West. November 5th, 2005 marks the 30th anniversary of Cuba's decision to deploy combat-troops, at the request of the Angolan government, to repulse a major South African invasion of October 1975. In 1987-1988, a decisive battle occurred in the south-eastern Angolan town of Cuito Cuanavale. When it occurred, the battle was the largest military engagement in Africa since the North African battles of the Second World War. Arrayed on one side were the armed forces of Cuba, Angola and the South West African People's Organization (SWAPO); on the other, the South African Defense Forces, military units of the Union for the Total National Independence of Angola (UNITA — the South African-supported organization) and the South African Territorial Forces of Pretoria-controlled Namibia.

b3a05edec84267f39b8a236b0ce7bb8f.jpg

P.S. Once again, thanks, Mike, for helping me track down that link.

02/20/2008

A worthy opponent

Time for an honest look at Cuba and ourselves, 

We, the United States, love, for some reason, to punish Cuba. Maybe it's our colonialist reaction to an unyielding nation that has the audacity to claim its autonomy in OUR hemisphere or maybe it's revenge for the Bay of Pigs. Whichever, our policies have produced nothing but misery for the Cuban people not that the average American is capable of giving a shit.

Our brains have not only been washed but sent a few too many times through the spin cycle and like the poor and disenfranchised here, as well as in Cuba and every other nation that we have ever sought to exploit, hung out to dry. Find an author that dares to write favorably of Castro and you have, according to the political mainstream, unearthed a dangerous lefty to be met, at the minimum, with scorn and derision.

The people in our southern hemisphere have been murdered, tortured and forced to live lives of misery for the benefit of a hand full of wealthy families and the corporations that they esteem. Our South American policy has consisted, *clandestinely, in overthrowing elected socialist leaders and installing extreme right wing dictators. That's changing, due in large part to huge oil reserves that we haven't been able to commandeer.

When I heard the Saul Landau interview on the Thom Hartmann radio show: Saul Landau Part 1.wav and Saul Landau Part 2.wav I was pleased. Castro was many things, and I'm sure if you or a family member were jailed and/or tortured for something anti-Castro that appeared in print or somehow gained public attention, you'd hate his guts as much as any American right-wing nut job. Saul Landau acknowledges Castro's accomplishments as a strong, successful leader who took a country wracked by corruption and improved it against the efforts of the most powerful nation on earth.  

Incidentally, how can you decry Castro's torture while condoning ours, and if you don't think that we have political prisoner's in OUR jails, you haven't been paying attention. Let's stop our 5 decade long embargo against the Cuban people and punishing them for the same crimes that we ourselves have committed and continue to commit. If communism has failed why do we still consider it a threat?  Gene

*The US Army School of Americas (SOA), based in Fort Benning, Georgia, trains Latin American security personnel in combat, counter-insurgency, and counter-narcotics. SOA graduates are responsible for some of the worst human rights abuses in Latin America. In 1996 the Pentagon was forced to release training manuals used at the school that advocated torture, extortion and execution. Among the SOA's nearly 60,000 graduates are notorious dictators Manuel Noriega and Omar Torrijos of Panama, Leopoldo Galtieri and Roberto Viola of Argentina, Juan Velasco Alvarado of Peru, Guillermo Rodriguez of Ecuador, and Hugo Banzer Suarez of Bolivia. Lower-level SOA graduates have participated in human rights abuses that include the assassination of Archbishop Oscar Romero and the El Mozote Massacre of 900 civilians. (See Grads in the News).

02/18/2008

The IRS video (very long)

Quick! Where's Chad? Is the economy good or bad? Is the surge working? WTF does that mean? Is there a law that requires you to pay income tax?

I know the answer to the last question you say, the 16th amendment! Give yourself a pat on the back for submitting to conventional wisdom. But, watch this and you'll walk away with doubts. Video director, Aaron Russo's case rests on the conclusion that the 16th amendment was never ratified. Was it? Here's a convincing article that it wasn't ratified by the required number of states: HOW SOME STATES DID NOT LEGALLY RATIFY THE 16TH AMENDMENT

According to this argument, you can stop paying income tax. There's no law requiring it. Oh, you'll eventually end up in jail or broken and destitute, but still, there's no law requiring you to pay income tax. It's sort of like a thing that's understood, needs no explanation, taken for granted, as obvious as the nose on your face. But how can we live in a country that through pure force extracts our hard earned money when we're a nation of laws?

Lots of people have fought the IRS and lost. We know it. We fear retribution and rather than admit that we cowardly let the government extort us we allow ourselves to assume that it's all perfectly legal, as certain as death and ... taxes. But according to a few, and they have made a strong case reinforced by the fact that the IRS has refused to address this fundamental issue, federal income tax is a scam.

I have to agree. When my money goes for wars and military extravaganzas that I have no control over other than writing, phoning or showing up at my congressman's doorstep, the system is a lie.

It's been said, incorrectly I submit, that you can't prove a negative. In other words I can't prove that the IRS doesn't have the right or authority to tax me, so, let them prove that they do. So far they haven't been amenable to that idea and there's no reason to assume that they ever will be as long as they have the force of law but not the law itself on their side.

It's actually comical, people bank on their tax refunds. When I get my tax refund I'm going to_________, fill in the blank. Having money is the form of a bulk amount isn't something that we generally have the opportunity to consider and so when the IRS sends us a fat check, we react jubilantly. We've been bred to have a supplicant mentality.

How would the government operate without taxes, specifically, without income taxes? Before 1913 the income tax didn't exist in it's present form, there was a tax but it was very limited in it scope. Our country operated on tariffs and excise taxes. During the Civil War an income tax law was enacted but was also repealed after the war. From 1868 to 1913, almost 90 percent of all revenue was collected from the remaining excises.

The Civil War, the Spanish American War, World War I, and World War II all conferred on the people raises to the income tax. I leave out the Social Security tax because I believe in helping people stave off poverty rather than kill them.

My conclusions: War = Taxes, Taxes = Bigger Government, Bigger Government = Corruption, Corruption = More Government, More Government = Absolute Power.

This is what we have now; concentrated corruption, power and unending war. The machine runs on our money but we have little say on the direction the that machine takes. Let this battle over the IRS's ability to tax us rage on, not that we shouldn't fund roads, hospitals, schools, the Arts or the plethera of things that make a society but this war against funding war is worth fighting.

02/17/2008

I find my calling

We can win with WOS!

I'm going to go out on a limb here and suggest that more people in the U.S. die directly or indirectly from stupidity than from terror inspired car bombs, suicide bombers, Jihad, radical Muslims, Islamofascism or whatever the term du jour happens to be.

It's a no brainier, yesterday:

Eight people were killed and six others were injured early yesterday morning in southern Prince George's County when a motorist unwittingly drove into a smoke-shrouded crowd of people gathered on a dark rural road to watch as two drivers roared off in an illegal street race, police said ...

A large crowd of spectators -- witness accounts ranged from 50 to almost 300 people -- had gathered about 3 a.m. to watch the race, police said. The racers had created a large cloud of smoke when they spun and screeched their tires in place while "burning out," which drivers do at the start of a race to warm their engines and tires...

The people in attendance ranged in ages from pre-schoolers to one man in his 60s. I'm sure if we had public executions people would take their kids to see them too. "See Johnny, what happens when you don't listen to your mother!"

What we need is an all out war on stupidity! I say lock up the stupid motherfuckers and throw away the key, Guantanamo is too good for them! Force the Stupid-doers to clean up their act, OR ELSE! You smoke, you're going down! Drink and drive? Bye-bye, see you in a HUNDRED YEARS!  And here's the kicker, let me be the judge! Yeah me. I'll decide who's stupid. I have vast experience. Stupid doesn't stand a chance with me around.

It may take billions, trillions but so what? Stupidity is on the rise. The sooner we do something about it the better, for you, me and little Johnny who just stuck a pencil up his nose!

Now, my aim isn't to make people smart, that's clearly impossible, I just want people to stop setting themselves on fire, stop going to monster truck events, and admit that "Professional Wrestling" is the most moronic "sport" ever conceived by man.

There are so many ways to be stupid, it's a daunting task trying to stop it. That's why I need your help and frankly I need your money. With money we win! What better way to say NO to stupid than to send me a LARGE donation. You'll instantly feel less stupid knowing that you, yes, old stupid you, are helping in the War On Stupidity!

Won't you help?   Gene (an ex-stupid person)

Worldly and other worldly concerns

Haven't posted for a couple days, no particular reason, just mild disgust over worldly concerns.
>
None of us gets out alive, I'm here for a good time not a long time, there are no survivors and other folksy, wisdomy things aside, I decided that the root cause of my malaise was a general lack of "good" sleep and I can't stress the "good" part enough.
>
Some nights I look forward to my recurrent, marathon nightmares, they certainly break up a rather mundane existence and they often offer clues, more than likely, misleading ones, to this Rubik Cube-like world I haunt.
>
The worst sleep is the sleep that never comes barely edging out the highly interrupted sleep. George Bush  would stand agog at the intricacies of our personal, non-sanctioned torture techniques.
>
Usually, the delicate minuet of our physical, and interrelated, mental well being is appropriately chaperoned by an ironic sense of humor and, when all else fails, a cutting sarcasm or worse. But, at times, the drum, drum, drum of the dark nether world that lurks behind every good intention and misplaced priority, harkens the voodoo, zombie dance of madness and slow, implacable death.
>  
We ourselves are delicate, more apt to be waylaid by microscopic invaders than by bare knuckled Huns.
>
What to do, what to do? Cling to religion? Cling to what we know: family, routine, and a belief system so embattled that the wheels often come crashing off? Or shall we be left, an island unto ourselves, spinning off tangentially from the whole, destination unknown, eyes wide open,  with a warrior's purpose and a warrior's heart?  Gene

All the posts