« 2008-04-30 | HomePage | 2008-05-06 »
05/04/2008
Writing just to write
Typical left wing doo doo,
>
I'd be dangerous if I had a clue, but I don't. I only have this machine screaming "Hear Ye, Hear Ye."
>
Truth be told, I don't spend a lot of time reading, or more properly, I deduce the author's point and then consider the rest amplification and buttress.
>
If pundits, commentators and learned men wrote like O' Henry with surprise endings it would be incumbent upon the reader to read to the very last period.
>
"......I completely disavow anything that proceeds this sentence," might be one ending, so that, expressing odd, or contradictory thoughts in advance and leaving the reader slightly perplexed, stimulated or amused is, all at once, in the last sentence, rendered inert.
>
But that would be silly. However, how, on the other hand, isn't reading something written by a hack like Krauthammer, silly? Or, silliness aside, the biggest tool in the hack's toolbox? Completely ignoring the obvious.
>
They take us on journeys that deride and destroy a second party association, and make their deadly, corrupt first party associations somehow, innocuous in their, "We have decided to overlook our own complicities and derangements in the name of solidarity to the party that's driving America to it's knees."
>
I like to make Krauthammer my object of derision, he's so deserving but aren't they all? Isn't Bill Kristol? Isn't the whole Fox network? Don't they all stand at the gates of hell bidding us entrance?
>
Oh, one more thing, I completely disavow anything that proceeds this sentence. Gene
17:10 Permalink | Comments (1) | Email this